JIL Sovereign
Force-Multiplier Proposal — UHG & XL-tier MCOs
Prepared 2026-05-15
For the SIU Director & CEO/CCO/GC
The closed-loop PI engine. Detect → CREB™ → CourtChain™ → Legal. Every 2 weeks. Automatic.
Cotiviti gives your SIU a flagged-claim spreadsheet. JIL gives your legal team a court-ready referral packet, every two weeks, on CourtChain™, FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authenticating. Same SIU. Same vendor stack. Net new recoveries that didn't exist before. We take 10% of what you actually recover. If you don't recover, you don't pay the contingency.
10%
Contingency on net cash recovered
2-wk
Continuous loop · auto-submit to legal
Your SIU
Leads governance · keeps every win

This is not a vendor consolidation pitch. Your existing PI vendors (Cotiviti, HMS, EXL, internal) catch the leakage they were built to catch — claim edits, DRG validation, TPL. JIL catches what no rules engine and no contingency-RAC can: the systemic patterns CMS PERM keeps citing. Multi-year recidivism across 3+ program years. LEIE-excluded providers still billing 8 years post-exclusion. CMRA / mailbox-address suppliers. Deceased-beneficiary billing. That's the 91% of the loss pool CMS measures but nobody recovers — because it requires cross-system joins nobody runs nightly. JIL runs them. Every claim. Every night. The wins belong to your SIU.

Three anchors — same proposition, three audiences

SIU Director

Career-positive force-multiplier

JIL is the back-office. Your SIU is the front line. Every case JIL surfaces enters your queue with substantiation already in hand. Your team approves, escalates, and takes credit. JIL never appears on the docket or in the OIG referral packet — only your SIU does.

Your headcount stays. Your vendor stack stays. Your relationships stay.

= 10× more wins, same team, same budget structure
CEO / CCO / GC

Statutory + fiduciary defense

42 CFR 422.503 (MA compliance program), 42 CFR 438.608 (Medicaid MCO FWA), ERISA §404 (fiduciary duty), SOX §404 (internal controls). One CourtChain™ anchor + FRE 902(13)/(14) CREB™ documents discharge of all four — measurably, in court-admissible form, against a public CMS dataset.

When the OIG, state AG, or a qui-tam relator comes calling: you have receipts.

= the strongest audit-defense posture in MCO PI
CFO / Procurement

Budget predictability + customer-aligned upside

Flat fee = 10–15% of your CMS-disclosed program-integrity contractor spend, capped, predictable. Contingency = 10% of net cash recovered, performance-aligned. Industry-standard SIU contingency is 15–25% of recovery. Outside counsel runs 33%.

Both pricing legs are publicly anchored. Both auditable line items.

= materially below market, fully transparent

The economics — retro proves the system, annual contract compounds it

JIL-addressable annual pool
$21B/yr
91% of CMS PERM-measured pool
4-yr retro pool (SOL-weighted)
$49B
One-time wave from base-dataset scan
3-yr MCO recovery (target)
$24.1B
25% capture rate
3-yr MCO net benefit (target)
$21.2B
After all JIL fees · 7.2× ROI

Y1–Y3 cash flow — Target scenario (25% capture)

LineY1Y2Y33-yr cum.
Retro recovery realized (Y1 33% / Y2 40% / Y3 27% of $12.3B pool)$4.04B$4.92B$3.31B$12.27B
Forward recovery realized (50% / 75% / 100% of $5.25B/yr)$2.63B$3.94B$5.25B$11.82B
Total MCO recovery realized$6.67B$8.86B$8.56B$24.09B
JIL retro-active scan (one-time, Y1 baseline build)$3.2M$3.2M
JIL flat fee (12.5% × $1.4B disclosed PI spend, capped)$175M$175M$175M$525M
JIL contingency (10% × net cash recovered)$667M$886M$856M$2,409M
Total JIL revenue$845M$1,061M$1,031M$2,937M
MCO net benefit$5.83B$7.80B$7.53B$21.16B

3-year totals — all three scenarios

3-yr cumulativeConservative (15%)Target (25%)Aggressive (40%)
MCO recovery realized$14.44B$24.09B$38.50B
JIL retro scan + 3-yr flat fees$528M$528M$528M
JIL contingency (10% × recovery)$1,444M$2,409M$3,850M
Total JIL revenue 3-yr$1.97B$2.94B$4.38B
MCO net benefit 3-yr$12.47B$21.16B$34.12B
3-yr ROI on JIL spend6.3×7.2×7.8×

Capture rates anchored to JIL's 11-engagement portfolio on real CMS Snowflake data ($29.5B surfaced at risk, $9.53B recovery high = ~32% capture against surfaced pool — between Target and Aggressive). Realization curves (Y1 33% / Y2 40% / Y3 27% retro; 50% / 75% / 100% forward) reflect typical MAC appeal + DOJ FCA + state MFCU recovery timelines. Aggressive band assumes JIL Corridor cross-MCO joins are wired by Y2.

What stays exactly the same · what gets force-multiplied

Unchanged

Your team, your vendors, your contracts

Cotiviti, HMS, EXL, internal SIU, outside counsel — all continue under their current scope. JIL operates parallel, surfacing the long-tail your current stack architecturally cannot catch. Zero displacement.

SIU Wins

Every case in your team's name

SIU receives pre-substantiated CREB™ packets. SIU approves the OIG SDP / DOJ FCA / state MFCU referral. JIL is acknowledged on the technical exhibit only — never as relator, never as fact witness, never on the docket cover.

SIU + GC Cover

Audit-defensible by construction

Every finding anchored to CourtChain™ + FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authenticating. When CMS, state AG, or a qui-tam relator asks "did you have a reasonable detection program?" the answer is verifiable, court-ready, dated, signed.

The wedge — what Cotiviti, HMS, and Optum-internal architecturally cannot do

CapabilityCotiviti / HMS / Optum-internalJIL Sovereign
CadenceQuarterly / monthly audits, sampling-basedNightly Tier-1 + biweekly closed-loop auto-submit to legal
TriageFlagged-claim list → SIU human review (weeks per case)AVA clusters + T2 auto-substantiation + CREB™ (hours per case)
EvidenceFlagged-claim spreadsheet with reason codesFRE 902(13)/(14) self-authenticating CREB™ on CourtChain™
Legal hand-offSIU writes the referral; legal rebuilds for filingAuto-submit to your legal team's queue, packets pre-formatted for OIG SDP / DOJ FCA / state MFCU
ScopeHealthcare claim editing + DRG + COB; post-payment onlyPre-settlement + retro · MCO + SNAP + Transportation + VA + Bank + Capital Markets on one contract
Data residencyData shipped to vendor; vendor holds at restRuns in your Snowflake / Databricks. JIL holds zero data at rest. SOC 2 inherits from your stack.
Pricing15–25% contingency plus subscription / per-finding10% net-recovery contingency + flat fee capped at 10–15% of your CMS-disclosed PI budget

What gets caught that the current stack architecturally cannot

Pattern (CMS PERM-cited)Why architectural — not a vendor failingJIL closes it via
Multi-year recidivism (3+ years)Each program year is a separate engagement; nobody stitches acrossAVA max-lookback rule; FCA scienter built in
LEIE post-exclusion billingNo vendor runs 83K LEIE × 259M Part-D rows nightlySnowflake compute · nightly LEIE×CMS cross-walk
CMRA / phantom-premise suppliersField investigation cost prohibitive at scaleUSPS-CMRA registry + Lob.com CASS+DPV (live)
Deceased-beneficiary billingSingle-case prosecution under-recovers; needs cohort scaleCMS deceased file × utilization cross-walk per program-year
PECOS-deactivated providers still billingCross-system reconciliation — not in any SIU's job descriptionPECOS × NPPES diff overlay on every claim
DRG creep / upcoding drift over timeYear-over-year comparison requires multi-vintage joinsAVA agentic clustering across multi-year DRG distributions
90-day SIU-led pilot · all-in $1M · downside-protected

Your SIU runs the show. We carry the math + the downside.

Onboarding: $1M flat, all-in, no per-finding charges during the pilot. JIL embeds 2 forensic analysts under your SIU's direction. Snowflake feed live in 5 business days. AVA workspace + CREB™ generation live in 10 days.

Pilot deliverables (your SIU's name on every one):

Asymmetric downside: If the 90-day deliverables miss, the $1M converts to a 6-month platform credit + contingency drops from 10% to 7.5%. No other vendor in MCO PI takes pure downside on the math.