GTM samples · continuous RADV

Redacted RADV demo walkthrough

What SIU, compliance, and counsel actually open when Horizon Aegis is working. Four RADV profiles of one CREB template on the same demo member: CREB-RADV (unsupported), AREB-RADV (supported), PIEB-RADV, and RREB-RADV (RRADV). Audit model is V24 (V22/V24 live; V28 ready, not active). No live PHI. No contingency recovery story. Shadow mode is the default.

All four RADV samples CREB-RADV JSON AREB-RADV JSON PIEB-RADV JSON RREB-RADV (RRADV) JSON MCO interactive case demo Horizon Aegis
Honesty labels. CREB-RADV, AREB-RADV, PIEB-RADV, and RREB-RADV are profiles of the four bundles—not a fifth engine. Horizon Aegis scores V22/V24 live. V28, MEAT, and B11 extrapolation stay ready_not_active. CourtChain™ public blocks are S3 encrypted custody for filing digests, not L1 BFT consensus. Simulation outputs are model exposure, not a CMS recovery guarantee. Default evaluation mode is shadow (no payment rail impact).

1. Scenario (synthetic)

Contract H0000-DEMO, payment year 2025, member member-demo-001. Horizon Aegis scores documentation support on V24 while claim traffic continues. V28 is not applied. Nothing holds or denies payment until a customer elevates governance out of shadow.

Mode
shadow (default)
Cycle
Shadow → Package → Seal → Act
Seal path
POST /v1/profiles/radv/seal on creb-service
Ownership
Institution owns packages; JIL is the neutral sealer

2. Side by side

CREB-RADV — findings issued

Adverse / unsupported path. Sample HCC18 (diabetes with complications framing) lacks contemporaneous assessment, monitoring, or treatment documentation in the evaluation window—only a historical mention.

Disposition
FINDINGS_ISSUED
Support score
0.15 · evidence strength none
Action
escalate_to_siu
Simulated impact
$2,400 (illustrative model exposure, not recovery)
Seal status
ready_for_seal · schema creb-radv-1.0

Download creb-radv-sample.json

AREB-RADV — supported

Affirmative path. Same demo estate, HCC19 with a progress note that assesses type 2 DM, monitors glucose, and continues metformin—documentation spans present for the evaluation window.

Disposition
SUPPORTED
Support score
0.92 · evidence strength strong
Summary
1 HCC evaluated · fully supported
Doc elements
Assess · Monitor · Treat (clinical note fields—not a CMS “MEAT standard” claim)
Seal status
ready_for_seal · schema areb-radv-1.0

Download areb-radv-sample.json

3. How a buyer walks the demo

  1. Open the JSON samples — confirm fields counsel care about: disposition, evidence excerpts, content_hash placeholder, sealing_metadata.
  2. Map to continuous readiness — packages draft while charts are still current, not after the CMS sample letter.
  3. Seal narrative — creb-service validates the RADV profile and seals a legal_evidence_bundle (lob=radv). Optional CourtChain public block for filing digest match without decrypting PHI.
  4. Act in SIU — prioritize escalate paths, keep supported packages for sample-day handoff, never invent a recovery guarantee from simulation alone.
  5. Commercial posture — flat platform fee for contracted scope. No contingency cut of recoveries. Diligence packet + MSA/DPA samples linked below.

4. Related institutional resources

Interactive MCO demo

End-to-end payment-integrity walkthrough from ingest to sealed CREB.

Open demo

Inside a CREB™

What MFCU, auditors, and counsel receive as the sealed record structure.

Read structure

Vendor diligence

Procurement and security packet; sample MSA & DPA drafts.

Diligence packet · MSA/DPA PDF

One-pagers & briefs

Institutional briefs library for SIU, finance, and counsel audiences.

Brief library · MCO flat-fee brief

The output is the product

Request an Evidence Audit

Bring a RADV exposure question or MCO claim pattern. We return sealed sample paths and architecture—not a spreadsheet of flags.