Pillar 2 / Retroactive Verification / Plaintiff counsel
Retroactive evidence engineering for qui tam counsel.
Your relator hands you a narrative. We do the retroactive claim-level investigation that turns it into a viable FCA filing - vendor history, NPI / EIN cluster analysis, statutory-element mapping to FCA / AKS / Stark elements, all anchored to the validator quorum and packaged as a CREB(TM) admissible under FRE 902(14). SaaS subprocessor under your engagement letter; your firm owns the relationship and the work product.
Substantiation is the gate. The relator narrative gets you in the door; the evidence is what makes a partner sign the engagement letter.
Every plaintiff firm running a qui tam practice has the same problem: dozens of inbound allegations per partner per quarter, finite associate time, and a substantiation step that requires document analysis, vendor history, and statutory-element mapping that didn't exist when the relator walked in. We do it as a SaaS subprocessor under your engagement letter - your privilege, your work product, our methodology.
- Federal False Claims Act. 31 USC §3729-33. Per-allegation retroactive analysis with statutory-element mapping to materiality, knowledge, falsity, and causation.
- Anti-Kickback Statute + Stark Law. Per-vendor relationship analysis (referral-source proxy detection, fair-market value benchmark, safe-harbor compliance map) with court-portable evidence per claim.
- State FCA variants. NY, CA, TX, FL, IL Medicaid FCA. Statute-specific element mapping with per-state CREB(TM) variants.
- IRS Section 7623 + Dodd-Frank 21F. IRS whistleblower + SEC TCR submissions. Reproducible methodology that survives IRS / SEC determination review.
T1 - Intake screening (5-10 days)
Per-relator allegation triage with viability score (0-100), statutory-element preview, defendant NPI/EIN cluster preview, OFAC + debarment screen. Output: SHA-256-sealed report. Most allegations end here at low cost; you only commit T2 spend on the ones with legs.
T2 - Substantiation (28-45 days)
Vendor history sweep (4+ year lookback), claim-level pattern detection, NPI/EIN cluster analysis with corporate-veil + beneficial-ownership pierce, statutory-element mapping with sub-element evidence pointers, expert-witness candidate identification, L1-anchored at every reasoning step.
T3 - CREB(TM) filing bundle
Court-ready CREB(TM) package with FRE 902(14) authentication block, full provenance chain, evidence index with Bates-style line cites, deposition prep packet, expert-witness reference. Drops into your complaint as Exhibit A.
Privilege architecture
BYO-bucket architecture: your client's underlying material lives in your firm's S3 under your KMS keys. JIL processes in flight only. Privilege unbroken under Kovel doctrine; subpoenas to JIL recover hashes, not material.
Tiered per-engagement pricing
| Tier | Output | Turnaround | Per-engagement fixed fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 - Intake screening | Allegation triage report + viability score + SHA-256-sealed report + L1 anchor | 5-10 business days | $5K-$12K |
| T2 - Substantiation | Evidence packet + cluster analysis + statutory-element map + expert-witness reference | 28-45 days per complexity | $25K-$65K |
| T3 - CREB(TM) filing bundle | Court-ready CREB(TM) + deposition prep + expert reference + FRE 902(14) authentication | 14-21 days after T2 lock | $45K-$120K |
Recovery-tied SKUs available where bar rules permit (Section 35.1.4). Anchor-firm year-one discounts apply through 2026. Counsel-to-counsel call available for Kovel posture + BAA scope review.
Ready to scope a wedge case?
We do a 30-min joint counsel-to-counsel call against a sanitized version of your case. You walk away with a T1 fee quote + go/no-go on the substantiation path. Most firms use T1 output to decide whether to commit T2 spend.