Vol. I · Cryptographic Verdict Record

Pillar 1 - Pre-Settlement Attestation

SAMPLE - Pillar 1

Cryptographic Verdict Record - Pre-Settlement Attestation.

This is a sample Cryptographic Verdict Record - the operational data half of a JIL Court Ready Evidence Bundle (CREB). The fields below show the structure of every real verdict: identifiers, subject, test profile, the full check matrix, the final verdict, and the cryptographic seal anchored to the JIL L1 chain by 14-of-20 SCN BFT validator quorum. Signed with hybrid Ed25519 and ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) for post-quantum durability.

Schedule a Call Request a briefing

Sample notice. All identifiers, hashes, signatures, validator quorum payloads, and timestamps in this document are fictitious. They preserve the structure of a real CREB envelope so a custodian or compliance officer can see exactly what JIL produces. Real records carry the same structure with live hashes anchored on the JIL L1 chain.

sample-01.json · download

175

Production checks across the institutional catalogue.

14 / 20

SCN BFT validator quorum signing every record.

FIPS 204

Post-quantum standard. Hybrid Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 on every signature.

Patent claims filed across attestation, evidence, and consensus.

273

Production services in continuous operation.

~1.4M

Lines of production code, third-party reviewed.

Part 1 of 3 · Executive Summary Memo

What this verdict says, in 30 seconds.

Every JIL Court-Ready Evidence Bundle ships with this memo at the top. Read this first; the cryptographic record below is the evidence backing every claim made here.

Internal Memorandum · SAMPLE

TO:	Custodian-X Compliance Officer; Trust Operations Lead
FROM:	JIL Sovereign Compliance Network · Pre-Settlement Attestation Engine
DATE:	2026-04-19 13:47:22.108 UTC (verdict delivered in 4.1 seconds end-to-end)
RE:	Pre-Settlement Attestation, $2,450,000 USD-stablecoin transfer to Recipient-Y
REPORT ID:	JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1
ATTESTATION:	ATT-892447-0000004812 · anchored to JIL L1 block #892,447

Verify this CREB

jilsovereign.com/verify/
JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1

Scan to retrieve the CREB + this memo. Public endpoint · no login required · verifies the cryptographic seal in real time.

Verdict

CLEAR · PROCEED

All 111 catalog checks PASS · 0 holds · 0 fails

The proposed transfer of $2,450,000 USD-stablecoin from Custodian-X's origin wallet to Recipient-Y's destination wallet on Ethereum mainnet has been screened against the full FWEA-INST-HIGH-VALUE-USD-v7.3.1 profile (111 of 111 catalog checks enabled, 0 out-of-scope). All 111 checks returned PASS. The recipient's beneficial-ownership graph, sanctions exposure, on-chain transaction history, address provenance, and counterparty risk profile are clean as of 2026-04-19 13:47:22.108 UTC.

Findings summary

	Check Class	Result
✓	FWEA · Identity, Sanctions, OFAC	All 18 checks PASS. No SDN, OpenSanctions, EU CFSP, UK HMT match against beneficial-owner graph (3-hop deep). LEI verified against GLEIF. KYC posture validated.
✓	FWEA · Address provenance	Destination wallet 412 days old, 1,847 prior transactions, no sanctioned contamination at any hop count up to 5. Not on the 33,547-address labeled-wallet index for any harm category.
✓	FWEA · Settlement integrity	Endpoint binding attested. Wrapped-asset bridge integrity checks pass. Latency budget met (4.1s vs 6s SLA).
✓	WIE · Behavioral signals	All 42 wallet-intelligence signals within tolerance. Velocity, novelty, graph distance, DeFi exposure all within profile baseline.

Recommended action

Proceed with the transfer. Verdict sealed to JIL L1 block #892,447 and written to the custodian's Secure Document Vault under the vendor's 15-year retention policy. No further investigation required for this transit.

Signed by JIL Sovereign Compliance Network on behalf of 14 of 20 SCN BFT validators across 13 jurisdictions. Hybrid Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) signature. Court-admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 902(14). Verifiable at the URL above by any third party without further authentication.

Part 2 of 3 · How we obtained these findings

Methodology, in plain English.

Every check listed in the memo above ran in a deterministic, reproducible pipeline. Anyone with the same inputs (the canonical request bytes) and the same check catalog produces the same verdict, byte-for-byte. There is no opinion, no human judgment, no methodology that can be cross-examined into doubt.

Step 1 · 13:47:18.022 UTC

Request received + canonicalized

Custodian-X's policy engine submitted the transit metadata over HMAC-signed REST. JIL canonicalized the request bytes (deterministic JSON serialization), computed the request hash, and bound it into the signature domain (chain ID + custodian + client + egress UUID + block-height window).

Step 2 · 13:47:18.118 UTC

Address-intel lookup (in-memory, ~100µs)

Origin and destination wallets queried against the 33,547-address labeled-wallet index (OFAC SDN crypto mirror, ScamSniffer, MEW darklist, Etherscan label cloud, DefiLlama, DPRK seed). No matches in any of the 7 harm categories. Source provenance recorded.

Step 3 · 13:47:18.342 UTC

Sanctions screen (parallel, ~280ms)

Recipient-Y's beneficial-owner graph (3 hops deep) screened against OFAC SDN (37,900 entries + 720 crypto), UN Consolidated (1K), EU CFSP (6K), UK HMT (39.5K), US CSL (25.6K), OpenSanctions/Yente (74.6K). Two-stage matcher: postgres token prefilter + jaro-winkler scoring at 0.85 threshold. Zero matches.

Step 4 · 13:47:19.605 UTC

KYC + identity verification (parallel, ~1.4s)

Sender + receiver IDs verified against Custodian-X's onboarding records (referenced by ID, not transmitted). Corridor risk computed against FATF high-risk + monitored jurisdictions list. IBAN MOD-97 + BIC ISO 9362 structural checks for the fiat leg. All checks PASS.

Step 5 · 13:47:21.188 UTC

Risk scoring (parallel, ~2.0s)

Behavioral signals: amount-deviation z-score 0.4 (within tolerance), velocity 1 transfer in last 60s (within profile baseline), novel-destination flag false (Recipient-Y has prior transactions with this sender), graph distance 1 hop. Score 12 / 100, band LOW. Zero risk-stack flags fired.

Step 6 · 13:47:22.108 UTC

BFT quorum signing + L1 anchor

Verdict + findings + canonical bytes hash submitted to the 14-of-20 SCN BFT validator quorum across 13 jurisdictions. Signatures aggregated (hybrid Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 per validator). Sealed CREB written to JIL L1 block #892,447. Stored in Custodian-X's Secure Document Vault. Verdict delivered to caller in 4.1 seconds end-to-end.

Reproducibility: any third party with the canonical request bytes + the published check catalog can re-run this verdict and arrive at the same result. The methodology is code, not opinion. The signature seals the bytes that produced the verdict, not just the conclusion. Verify this CREB independently ›

Part 3 of 3 · The cryptographic record

The full CREB envelope, verbatim.

All cryptographic content below is preserved verbatim from the canonical sample. Tables, hash strings, signature blocks, and validator quorum payloads have not been modified - they are the sample.

JIL Sovereign Technologies, Inc.

Cryptographic Verdict Authority - Pillar 1

Report Identifier

JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1

Issued: 2026-04-19 13:47:22 UTC

Completed: 2026-04-19 13:47:22.108 UTC

Scan to verify
/verify/JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1

Cryptographic Verdict Record

Court-Admissible - Independently Verifiable - Tamper-Evident

SAMPLE - FICTITIOUS SUBJECT DATA

Executive Summary (plain English)

Verdict: YES

Settlement permitted within SLA window

Question we answered

Is this $2.45M USD-stablecoin transfer between two institutional counterparties safe to settle?

What you told us (inputs)

From	Redacted Trust Custodian (Custodian-X), verified KYC Tier 3
To	Redacted Legal Entity (Recipient-Y), LEI 549300XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, GLEIF-verified
Amount	$2,450,000.00 USD in wUSDC-JIL (JIL-bridged USDC on Ethereum)
Purpose	TRADE - Institutional OTC counterparty transfer

What we checked

All 111 checks in the institutional high-value USD profile (69 FWEA + 42 WIE)
Named-person sanctions against 10 jurisdictional lists (OFAC, EU, UK OFSI, UN, SECO, etc.)
Destination wallet SDN hash-table lookup (O(1), every jurisdiction list)
2-hop transaction-graph taint analysis against known darknet / ransomware / mixer / state-actor clusters
Settlement-instruction integrity (IBAN MOD-97, BIC ISO 9362, endpoint-binding attestation)
Velocity, typology, and jurisdictional-corridor behavioral checks

What we found

Zero sanctions matches on the originator, counterparty, or beneficial-owner tree (depth-3 UBO traversal)
Destination wallet is not in any published SDN list
Taint exposure to known-bad clusters: 0.02% (threshold is 1.0%)
Velocity pattern within normal 90-day baseline for this entity
US → Singapore corridor is compliant; no cross-border travel-rule trigger
Settlement-instruction cryptographic integrity verified; endpoint binding attested

Recommended action

Proceed with the transfer. Verdict sealed to JIL L1 block #892,447 and written to the custodian's Secure Document Vault under the vendor's 15-year retention policy.

0Identifiers, Retrieval, and Retention

Report ID (this document): JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1
Attestation ID: ATT-892447-0000004812
Vendor ID (requester): VND-CX-0047 (Custodian-X, onboarded 2025-11-08)
Profile ID: PRF-FWEA-INST-HIGH-VALUE-USD-v7.3.1
Date Completed: 2026-04-19 13:47:22.108 UTC (epoch 1776649642.108)
Storage Location (vendor-controlled): Vendor SDV endpoint sdv://VND-CX-0047.eu-central.hel1.jil-sdv/, object key verdicts/pre-settlement/2026/04/19/JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1.pdf.sealed. AES-256-GCM encrypted, vendor-held key.
Content Hash (SHA-256): f0e9d8c7b6a594837261504392817263abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789
Retention Period: 15 years minimum. Exceeds BSA / FATF / NYDFS / HIPAA requirements. Permanent retention may be elected by vendor.
Retrieval Index (JIL-side): Indexed in trust.verdict_records + replicated to verdict_index.clickhouse. Queryable by report_id, attestation_id, vendor_id, profile_id, date_completed, subject_hash, L1 anchor tx.
Retrieval API: Authenticated vendors: GET /api/v1/verdicts/{report_id}. Courts/regulators: GET /verify/{report_id} returns verification metadata without PII; blob retrieval requires vendor consent or court order served on vendor.

1Subject of Verdict

Request Type: Pre-Settlement Attestation (Pillar 1)
Requesting Party: Redacted Trust Custodian ("Custodian-X"), Client-ID hash cx:8a3f:e91d:44c6
Counterparty (claimed): Redacted Legal Entity ("Recipient-Y"), LEI 549300XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Asset: USD-stablecoin (wUSDC-JIL), amount $2,450,000.00 USD
Origin Wallet: 0x7Bcff27567cfE3e67020a0d771a445178756aBa2
Destination Wallet: 0xA19D3b4F8e8c2E41FD6e9f2bC5a8c3d4E7F8a0C1
Chain: Ethereum mainnet (chain-id 1), to be settled via JIL L1 bridge
Purpose Code: TRADE - Institutional OTC counterparty transfer
Latency Budget: 6 seconds (custodian SLA); actual verdict delivered in 4.1s

2Test Profile Applied

Profile Name: FWEA-INST-HIGH-VALUE-USD-v7.3.1
Profile Description: Institutional high-value USD stablecoin transfer. Full FWEA + full WIE.
Total Catalog Size: 111 checks (69 FWEA + 42 WIE)
Approved for this Profile: 111 of 111 checks enabled
Out of Scope (not approved): 0 of 111 checks disabled for this profile

Coverage transparency: both approved and out-of-scope checks are listed in Section 4 for full court defensibility. No hidden checks, no silent omissions.

3Approved Checks - Full Test Matrix (Section 4A)

111 APPROVED Each approved check ran during verdict assembly. Method, source, result, and per-check evidence hash listed below. Individually Ed25519-signed and rolled up into Section 6 Merkle root.

Check ID	Test Name	Method	Source	Result	Evidence Hash
FWEA-01	OFAC person match (origin)	Exact + fuzzy (Levenshtein <=2, phonetic Soundex)	OFAC SDN + CSL	CLEAR	sha256:01of...f1i
FWEA-02	OFAC person match (counterparty)	Exact + fuzzy + transliteration	OFAC SDN + CSL + EU + UK	CLEAR	sha256:02of...f2i
FWEA-03	PEP screening - beneficial owners	UBO graph traversal to depth 3	OpenSanctions PEP list	CLEAR	sha256:03pe...f3i
FWEA-04	Synthetic identity detection	Document cross-reference + velocity modeling	GLEIF + OpenCorporates + telco records	CLEAR	sha256:04sy...f4i
FWEA-05	Document deepfake detection	Signature + metadata + font analysis	JIL document integrity ML	CLEAR	sha256:05do...f5i
FWEA-06	AI voice deepfake at authorization	Spectral + prosodic + behavioral analysis	JIL voice auth ML	CLEAR	sha256:06ai...f6i
FWEA-07	Destination wallet SDN match	O(1) hash-table lookup (<1ms)	OFAC SDN + CSL + UK OFSI	CLEAR	sha256:07de...f7i
FWEA-08	Business Email Compromise (BEC) pattern	Domain similarity + content ML classifier	JIL BEC detector + OpenAI moderation	CLEAR	sha256:08bu...f8p
FWEA-09	Invoice fraud detection	Invoice fingerprinting + duplicate detection	JIL invoice graph	CLEAR	sha256:09in...f9p
FWEA-10	Account takeover (ATO) signals	Device fingerprint + behavior delta	JIL session telemetry	CLEAR	sha256:10ac...f0p
FWEA-11	Authorized Push Payment (APP) scam	Behavioral deviation + destination risk	JIL APP detector	CLEAR	sha256:11au...f1p
FWEA-12	Wire anomaly detection	Z-score vs entity baseline (90d window)	Custodian feed + JIL baseline	CLEAR	sha256:12wi...f2p
FWEA-13	SEPA APP fraud pattern (EU)	SEPA rail-specific heuristics	EBA SEPA registry + JIL detector	CLEAR	sha256:13se...f3p
FWEA-14	UK FPS Payment System Regulator (PSR) profile	FPS reimbursement-risk scoring	UK FPS + PSR guidance	CLEAR	sha256:14uk...f4p
FWEA-15	PIX fraud typology (Brazil)	PIX chain-of-claim verification	BCB PIX registry	CLEAR	sha256:15pi...f5p
FWEA-16	UPI fraud typology (India)	UPI VPA collision + spoof detection	NPCI UPI registry	CLEAR	sha256:16up...f6p
FWEA-17	SWIFT gpi chain substitution	MT103 hop-by-hop integrity check	SWIFT gpi tracker	CLEAR	sha256:17sw...f7p
FWEA-18	CIPS sanctioned-entity routing	CIPS routing graph + sanctions overlay	PBoC CIPS + OFAC overlay	CLEAR	sha256:18ci...f8p
FWEA-19	NPP PayID integrity (Australia)	PayID binding verification	AusPayNet NPP	CLEAR	sha256:19np...f9p
FWEA-20	DPAN wallet provisioning fraud	Device Provisioning API anomaly	Card network DPAN logs	CLEAR	sha256:20dp...f0p
FWEA-21	Magecart / e-skimmer merchant compromise	Merchant page script integrity	JIL merchant monitor	CLEAR	sha256:21ma...f1p
FWEA-22	Cryptocurrency off-ramp anomaly	Off-ramp velocity vs historical	Chainalysis + JIL off-ramp registry	CLEAR	sha256:22cr...f2p
FWEA-23	Check kite / float fraud	Inter-account timing graph	JIL check clearance timing	CLEAR	sha256:23ch...f3p
FWEA-24	Settlement instruction integrity	IBAN MOD-97 + BIC ISO 9362 + endpoint attestation	JIL L1 settlement path	PASS	sha256:24se...f4p
FWEA-25	OFAC country-level sanctions	Jurisdiction routing check (IR, KP, SY, CU, RU-partial)	OFAC country list	CLEAR	sha256:25of...f5r
FWEA-26	EU MiCA stablecoin classification	Token symbol + issuer + whitelist	EBA regulated tokens list	PASS	sha256:26eu...f6r
FWEA-27	EU DORA operational resilience	ICT risk attestation presence	EBA DORA registry	PASS	sha256:27eu...f7r
FWEA-28	UK FCA authorization status	FCA register lookup + passport check	FCA Register	PASS	sha256:28uk...f8r
FWEA-29	FATF International Travel Rule (>$3K)	Originator / beneficiary data completeness	FATF Travel Rule Protocol + IVMS 101	PASS	sha256:29fa...f9r
FWEA-30	CBDC attestation (eCNY / DEUR / mBridge)	CBDC issuer + compliance-envelope check	BIS mBridge + PBoC eCNY + ECB DEUR	N/A	sha256:30cb...f0r
FWEA-31	NYDFS Part 500 applicability	Counterparty NYDFS-regulated flag	NYDFS covered entity list	PASS	sha256:31ny...f1r
FWEA-32	SEC Reg S / Reg D (if applicable)	Investor accreditation + jurisdiction	SEC filings + investor attestation	N/A	sha256:32se...f2r
FWEA-33	MAS Singapore DPT Act applicability	Singapore counterparty check	MAS DPT licensee list	PASS	sha256:33ma...f3r
FWEA-34	VARA UAE crypto licensing	UAE counterparty license lookup	VARA licensee registry	PASS	sha256:34va...f4r
FWEA-35	State MTL jurisdiction check	US state-by-state money transmitter overlay	NMLS MT licensing database	PASS	sha256:35st...f5r
FWEA-36	Velocity anomaly (origin 48h)	Rolling z-score vs 90d baseline	JIL L1 + custodian feed	PASS (z=0.84)	sha256:36ve...f6t
FWEA-37	Mule account scoring	Inbound-outbound timing + network centrality	JIL mule detector	CLEAR	sha256:37mu...f7t
FWEA-38	Smurfing / structuring pattern	Sub-threshold frequency + 24h rollup	JIL structuring detector	CLEAR	sha256:38sm...f8t
FWEA-39	Geographic anomaly	Origin-destination distance vs entity norm	JIL geo baseline	CLEAR	sha256:39ge...f9t
FWEA-40	Bust-out credit fraud pattern	Credit utilization curve analysis	FICO + experian bust-out model	N/A	sha256:40bu...f0t
FWEA-41	Round-amount / psychological pricing flag	Statistical distribution vs entity norm	JIL amount analyzer	CLEAR	sha256:41ro...f1t
FWEA-42	Night / off-hours activity	Time-of-day distribution outlier	JIL temporal baseline	CLEAR	sha256:42ni...f2t
FWEA-43	Routing change detection (<72h)	Last-minute routing delta alert	Custodian instruction log	CLEAR	sha256:43ro...f3s
FWEA-44	Account-number change alert	Counterparty account history vs current	Custodian counterparty ledger	CLEAR	sha256:44ac...f4s
FWEA-45	Instruction provenance attestation	Signed chain from originator	JIL instruction attestation	PASS	sha256:45in...f5s
FWEA-46	IBAN integrity (MOD-97)	Checksum + country length validation	ISO 13616 IBAN registry	PASS	sha256:46ib...f6s
FWEA-47	Correspondent chain hop anomaly	Hop-count + jurisdiction diversity	SWIFT gpi trace	CLEAR	sha256:47co...f7s
FWEA-48	Real estate closing wire protection	Closing agent attestation required	ALTA closing protection	N/A	sha256:48re...f8s
FWEA-49	Endpoint binding attestation	Destination wallet bound to counterparty identity	JIL endpoint-binding registry	PASS	sha256:49en...f9s
FWEA-50	Duplicate claim detection	Claim-ID + subject-service fingerprint	CMS NCCI + JIL dedupe	N/A	sha256:50du...f0h
FWEA-51	NPI provider enrollment status	NPI active + no-deactivation check	CMS PECOS + NPPES	N/A	sha256:51np...f1h
FWEA-52	Upcoding detection	Code frequency distribution vs peer	CMS MIPS + peer benchmarks	N/A	sha256:52up...f2h
FWEA-53	Remittance mismatch	837P vs 835 reconciliation	Clearinghouse remittance	N/A	sha256:53re...f3h
FWEA-54	Overpayment recovery flag	Historical overpayment pattern match	CMS overpayment database	N/A	sha256:54ov...f4h
FWEA-55	Fraud ring graph analysis	Community detection on entity graph	JIL fraud-ring detector	CLEAR	sha256:55fr...f5m
FWEA-56	Typology library pattern match	Published typology overlay (pig-butchering, APP, etc)	JIL typology library v3	CLEAR	sha256:56ty...f6m
FWEA-57	Cross-rail correlation	Same entity on multiple rails	JIL entity resolution	CLEAR	sha256:57cr...f7m
FWEA-58	FaaS (Fraud-as-a-Service) infrastructure	Known FaaS C2 + tooling signature	JIL FaaS intel	CLEAR	sha256:58fa...f8m
FWEA-59	FATF typology pattern match	Graph-motif match across 30d window	JIL L1 + Chainalysis clusters	CLEAR	sha256:59fa...f9c
FWEA-60	Egmont FIU intelligence overlay	FIU-flagged entity check	Egmont Group secure channel	CLEAR	sha256:60eg...f0c
FWEA-61	BIS CPMI payment system risk	Payment corridor risk score	BIS CPMI annual report data	LOW	sha256:61bi...f1c
FWEA-62	Cross-border velocity multi-jurisdiction	Velocity across 3+ jurisdictions 7d	JIL cross-border detector	CLEAR	sha256:62cr...f2c
FWEA-63	Sanctioned-jurisdiction hub routing	Proximity to sanctioned corridor	OFAC country list + corridor graph	CLEAR	sha256:63sa...f3c
FWEA-64	TBML with World Bank commodity prices	Invoice-price variance vs market	World Bank commodity index + WCO	CLEAR	sha256:64tb...f4c
FWEA-65	Pig butchering / romance-investment scam	Behavior + destination + dialog ML	JIL pig-butcher registry + NIST	CLEAR	sha256:65pi...f5e
FWEA-66	FaaS C2 infrastructure attribution	Infrastructure overlap with known FaaS	JIL FaaS infra graph	CLEAR	sha256:66fa...f6e
FWEA-67	ZKP post-settlement attestation	Zero-knowledge proof of compliant state	JIL ZKP prover	PASS	sha256:67zk...f7c
FWEA-68	Adversarial ML drift detection	Model drift vs golden baseline	JIL ML governance	CLEAR	sha256:68ad...f8c
FWEA-69	HNDL quantum-safe TLS verification	Dilithium + X25519 handshake verified	JIL TLS attestation	PASS	sha256:69hn...f9c
WIE-01	Destination wallet age	Genesis-tx trace + funding attribution	JIL L1 on-chain history	847 days (LOW RISK)	sha256:01de...w1w
WIE-02	Funding source attribution	Recursive source-of-funds trace	JIL attribution-evm + Chainalysis	CLEAR	sha256:02fu...w2w
WIE-03	First-block recency flag	Age vs transaction volume ratio	JIL L1 + chain-specific	CLEAR	sha256:03fi...w3w
WIE-04	Dormancy awakening signal	Long-dormant -> sudden activity	JIL dormancy tracker	CLEAR	sha256:04do...w4w
WIE-05	Dust attack detection	Micro-tx flood pattern	JIL dust detector	CLEAR	sha256:05du...w5w
WIE-06	Fresh-wallet-with-instant-activity	Activity within 1h of creation	JIL creation telemetry	CLEAR	sha256:06fr...w6w
WIE-07	Bulk wallet creation signal	Sequential wallet creation cluster	JIL creation graph	CLEAR	sha256:07bu...w7w
WIE-08	Contamination 2-hop weighted	Graph traversal, decay-weighted exposure scoring	JIL L1 + Chainalysis	0.02% (CLEAR)	sha256:08co...w8c
WIE-09	Direct darknet exposure	0-hop match to known darknet wallets	JIL known-bad registry	CLEAR	sha256:09di...w9c
WIE-10	Direct ransomware operator exposure	0-hop match to ransomware wallets	JIL ransomware intel (Conti/LockBit/BlackCat/Cl0p)	CLEAR	sha256:10di...w0c
WIE-11	Mixer/tumbler exposure	Exposure to Tornado Cash, Blender.io, ChipMixer, Sinbad	JIL mixer registry	CLEAR	sha256:11mi...w1c
WIE-12	Exchange-hack cluster exposure	Mt. Gox, Bitfinex, FTX, KuCoin hack wallets	JIL hack attribution	CLEAR	sha256:12ex...w2c
WIE-13	Known-bad cluster exposure (full)	0/1/2/3-hop lookup against all known-bad	JIL known-bad registry	CLEAR	sha256:13kn...w3c
WIE-14	State-actor cluster exposure	Lazarus Group, APT38, Russian ransomware	JIL state-actor attribution	CLEAR	sha256:14st...w4c
WIE-15	Transaction cadence anomaly	Inter-arrival time distribution	JIL L1 cadence analyzer	CLEAR	sha256:15tr...w5v
WIE-16	Amount distribution outlier	Distribution vs 90d self-baseline	JIL amount analyzer	CLEAR	sha256:16am...w6v
WIE-17	Bot activity signature	Automated tx signing pattern	JIL bot detector	CLEAR	sha256:17bo...w7v
WIE-18	Burst-and-drain pattern	High inbound then full drain	JIL burst detector	CLEAR	sha256:18bu...w8v
WIE-19	Round-amount trading	Round-number frequency outlier	JIL amount analyzer	CLEAR	sha256:19ro...w9v
WIE-20	Fragmentation pattern	Tx split into sub-threshold batches	JIL fragmentation detector	CLEAR	sha256:20fr...w0v
WIE-21	Cross-chain arbitrage signature	Arbitrage-like paired tx across chains	JIL cross-chain detector	CLEAR	sha256:21cr...w1v
WIE-22	Protocol whitelist match	Interacted protocols in whitelist	JIL DeFi whitelist	94/100 (HIGH TRUST)	sha256:22pr...w2d
WIE-23	LP quality score	Uniswap / Balancer pool quality	JIL DeFi attestation ledger	HIGH	sha256:23lp...w3d
WIE-24	Rug-pull heuristic	Known rug-pull cluster exposure	JIL rug-pull registry	CLEAR	sha256:24ru...w4d
WIE-25	Yield-farming exposure	Yield-protocol interaction + risk tier	JIL yield-farm classifier	LOW	sha256:25yi...w5d
WIE-26	Flash-loan anomaly	Flash-loan pattern in history	JIL flash-loan detector	CLEAR	sha256:26fl...w6d
WIE-27	Bridge-exploit exposure	Known bridge-exploit interaction	JIL bridge-exploit registry	CLEAR	sha256:27br...w7d
WIE-28	Governance manipulation signal	Flash-loan governance attack pattern	JIL governance-attack detector	CLEAR	sha256:28go...w8d
WIE-29	Cross-wallet clustering	JIL attribution engine (BTC/EVM/SOL/TRX)	JIL attribution engines	No discrepancy	sha256:29cr...w9h
WIE-30	Change-address heuristic (BTC)	Multi-input + change detection	JIL attribution-btc	CLEAR	sha256:30ch...w0h
WIE-31	Common-ownership heuristic	Co-spending patterns across wallets	JIL attribution-btc/evm	CLEAR	sha256:31co...w1h
WIE-32	Bridge-correlation clustering	Cross-chain bridge traffic as identity	JIL attribution-bridges	CLEAR	sha256:32br...w2h
WIE-33	CEX-withdrawal correlation	CEX-withdrawal timing + amount match	JIL CEX attribution	CLEAR	sha256:33ce...w3h
WIE-34	Off-chain-linked wallet	Corporate entity + wallet linkage via OpenCorporates	OpenCorporates + JIL entity graph	CLEAR	sha256:34of...w4h
WIE-35	Real-estate linked wallet	Property-purchase blockchain linkage	ATTOM Property + JIL entity graph	CLEAR	sha256:35re...w5h
WIE-36	Jurisdictional fit (corridor)	Counterparty jurisdiction vs origin corridor	GLEIF + OpenCorporates	PASS (US-SG corridor compliant)	sha256:36ju...w6r
WIE-37	Sanctions-list proximity	Distance to any sanctioned wallet in graph	OFAC + EU + UK SDN + JIL L1	> 4 hops (CLEAR)	sha256:37sa...w7r
WIE-38	PEP overlap (counterparty UBO)	UBO graph overlap with PEP list	OpenSanctions PEP	CLEAR	sha256:38pe...w8r
WIE-39	Adverse media flag	Counterparty name in adverse-media feed	OpenSanctions media + Dow Jones	CLEAR	sha256:39ad...w9r
WIE-40	Taint-free proof	Cumulative contamination score under 1%	JIL taint calculator	0.02% (PASS)	sha256:40ta...w0r
WIE-41	MiCA stablecoin eligibility	Token MiCA-registered flag	EBA MiCA registry	PASS	sha256:41mi...w1r
WIE-42	Travel-rule data completeness	Originator+beneficiary data fields populated	IVMS 101 validator	PASS	sha256:42tr...w2r

3Out-of-Scope Checks - Not Enabled (Section 4B)

0 OUT OF SCOPE Listed for transparency. These checks exist in the 111-check catalog but were not enabled in this profile. Their omission is explicit, auditable, and court-defensible.

Check ID	Test Name	Status
All 111 checks in the catalog are approved for this profile.

5Final Verdict

Attested Disposition

YES

Confidence: 98.4% | Settlement permitted within SLA window

Reasoning Summary

All approved checks cleared within threshold profile
No Layer-1 sanctions match (origin, counterparty, UBO graph through depth 3)
No Layer-2 destination-wallet SDN match across 10 jurisdictional lists
Layer-3 taint analysis: 0.02% exposure to any known-bad cluster; below 1% threshold
Velocity, typology, and jurisdictional corridor checks within normal bounds
FWEA-24 settlement-instruction integrity verified; endpoint binding attested

6Cryptographic Seal and Anchor

Issuer: JIL Sovereign Technologies, Inc. (DE)
Signing Algorithm: Ed25519 + Dilithium-III (classical + post-quantum hybrid)
Issuer Signature: f0e9d8c7b6a594837261504392817263abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789
Validator Quorum: 14 of 20 across 10 jurisdictions (70% threshold exceeded)
JIL L1 Anchor: delivery-hash: 1y2z3a4b5c6d...
Merkle Root: Rolled up from Section 4A per-check evidence hashes

Verify at
jilsovereign.com/verify/
JIL-VR-PS-2026-04-19-A8F3C2D1

7Chain of Custody Timeline

13:47:18.003 UTC	Custodian POST /authorize received	req-hash: 8a9b0c1d2e3f...
13:47:18.041 UTC	Test profile FWEA-INST-HIGH-VALUE-USD-v7.3.1 loaded and attested	profile-hash: 4g5h6i7j8k9l...
13:47:18.112 UTC	111 approved checks dispatched in parallel	dispatch-hash: 0m1n2o3p4q5r...
13:47:19.847 UTC	All approved checks returned. Merkle roll-up computed.	merkle-root: 1234...cdef
13:47:19.912 UTC	Preliminary verdict assembled: YES (confidence 98.4%)	verdict-hash: f0e9...6789
13:47:20.184 UTC	Verdict submitted to validator quorum	submission-hash: 5s6t7u8v9w0x...
13:47:21.442 UTC	14 of 20 validators signed across 10 jurisdictions (70% threshold)	quorum-hash: 9f8e...abcd
13:47:21.897 UTC	Verdict anchored to JIL L1 block #892,447	tx-hash: 0xdef0...789a
13:47:22.108 UTC	Sealed record generated and delivered to custodian	delivery-hash: 1y2z3a4b5c6d...
13:47:22.164 UTC	Record written to vendor SDV (VND-CX-0047 endpoint)	sdv-object: verdicts/pre-settlement/2026/04/19/...
13:47:22.191 UTC	Indexed in trust.verdict_records + replicated to verdict_index.clickhouse	index-id: VR-INDEX-1776649642108

Total latency: 4.105 seconds. SDV write + retrieval-index commit +83ms. Within 6-second SLA.

Tamper Evidence. Any modification to this record - including whitespace, font, or formatting changes after issuance - invalidates the seal. Independent verification does not require JIL Sovereign's cooperation and can be performed by any party that can compute a SHA-256 hash, verify an Ed25519 signature, and query the JIL L1 public ledger for the anchor transaction. The verification procedure is published at jilsovereign.com/verify and is open-source.

8Authorized Evidentiary Uses

Federal court admission under FRE 702 (expert testimony) and 901 (authentication) - cryptographic anchor authenticates without requiring JIL as fact witness.
Regulatory submission to OFAC, FinCEN, SEC, and state attorneys general.
Custodian compliance evidence for SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, NYDFS Part 500, HITRUST CSF audits.
Internal audit trail under BSA 5-year recordkeeping (JIL retention exceeds at 15+ years).
Due diligence evidence for correspondent banking, MSB registration, VASP Travel Rule.

JIL Sovereign Technologies, Inc. - Delaware C-Corporation - Dallas, Texas
Patent portfolio: 48 issued, 11 in flight. This record is not financial advice. It is an attested computational result. It is a fact, not an opinion.
Questions: Request a briefing - Response SLA: 24 hours.

Engagement

See a real verdict, in your environment.

Every JIL settlement, pre-clearance, asset-intelligence query, and retroactive verification produces a record of this exact shape. The hashes below would resolve on the live JIL L1; the signatures below would verify against the live SCN validator key set.

Schedule a Call Request a briefing

Loading sample-01.json ...

The JSON envelope above is the operational data half of the CREB(TM). The Memo + Methodology + Envelope rendering on the "Rendered evidence package" tab is generated deterministically from this JSON; the JSON is the canonical source for FRE 902(14) self-authentication.