Institutional Roadmap
Key milestones for JIL Sovereign policy and attestation infrastructure. Factual timeline, no hype.
Foundation and Validation
- External engineering verification complete - system verification of the settlement protocol, MPC key management, and cryptographic signing across the compliance network by Emerging Technologies, LLC (Scottsdale, AZ) and BlockChainX (Hyderabad, India), report JIL-CSVR-2026-001. That is an engineering verification engagement, not a security audit: the independent external security audit of the L1 has not been engaged.
- 10 JIL-operated signing nodes active across 10 policy zones, with an active consensus set drawn from that fleet
- 350+ production services deployed and operational
- 177 patent claims filed
Production Settlement Protocol
- Pre-production settlement protocol live - full settlement flow operational with threshold cryptographic signing across the active set on the 10-node JIL-operated fleet (hybrid-signed) and sub-2-second finality. The 20-node fabric is a planned Q4 2026 target.
- Cross-chain bridge operational for ETH, USDC, USDT, WBTC, DAI
- Institutional API documentation and sandbox environment available
- Settlement execution layer integrated with the verification layer - deterministic batch execution with fair ordering, no front-running, no MEV extraction
- SentinelAI fleet monitoring active across all signing nodes with automated health recovery
Institutional POC and Integration
- First institutional proof-of-concept corridor - controlled settlement corridor with selected institutional participants
- NACHA/SWIFT integration gateway - translation layer enabling interoperability between JIL settlement and traditional payment rails
- Institutional onboarding toolkit - compliance documentation, integration guides, and dedicated support channel
Compliance Certification
- Target: engage an audit firm for a SOC 2 Type I controls assessment. No firm is engaged today
- Institutional settlement volume reporting and analytics dashboard
- Enhanced compliance engine with configurable policy templates for different regulatory jurisdictions
- Additional independent signing nodes provisioned based on settlement volume requirements
Expansion
- Signing-node partner expansion - onboarding additional independent operators to increase network distribution and geographic coverage
- Additional jurisdiction onboarding - extending compliance coverage based on institutional demand and regulatory developments
- SOC 2 Type II certification, sequenced after an audit firm is engaged. No firm is engaged today and no date is committed
- Advanced settlement corridors - multi-asset, multi-jurisdiction settlement flows for complex institutional transactions
Compliance posture by inheritance: Snowflake Native App + Databricks Brickbuilder.
In parallel to the standalone Build Track above, JIL is shipping native deployments inside the customer's existing certified data platform - Snowflake Container Services and Databricks Apps. The customer's data plane is unchanged. JIL services run as containers inside the customer's account. The customer's data plane keeps its own certified posture: HITRUST r2, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA + BAA, FedRAMP MOD, PCI DSS - already in place at Snowflake and Databricks, covering their platforms and not JIL. JIL Cloud (Amazon EKS) is the third path for federal and air-gap workloads.
Snowflake Native App - Snowpark Container Services
- Verdict Engine running inside customer Snowflake account via Snowpark Container Services
- Runs inside the customer's certified Snowflake boundary: HITRUST r2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA + BAA, FedRAMP MOD and PCI DSS cover Snowflake's platform, not JIL
- Customer data never leaves customer account; hashes only cross to CourtChain™
- Marketplace listing in flight
Databricks Brickbuilder Apps
- Verdict Engine deployed inside customer Databricks workspace
- Delta Lake substrate, Unity Catalog governance, Photon query engine
- Same inherited compliance posture as Snowflake (HITRUST / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / FedRAMP MOD)
- Best fit for lakehouse-native, ML-heavy customers running Unity Catalog
JIL Cloud - Amazon EKS
- Direct deployment on JIL-operated EKS infrastructure (KMS, IAM, GuardDuty)
- Target: SOC 2 Type 1, then Type 2. Compliance automation vendor not yet selected and no audit firm is engaged
- Target: HITRUST i1, then r2. No authorized external assessor is engaged
- FedRAMP MOD roadmap, GovRAMP Ready 3-4 months, StateRAMP roadmap
- For federal customers requiring authorization paths and any institution requiring maximum operational control
Federal Channel Activation
- Channel partnerships through Accenture Federal Services, Leidos, SAIC, Peraton
- 60-120 day path to fielded capability under partner ATO/FedRAMP authorities
- Reference Medicare model: 12.5% of disclosed PI spend (annual, capped) plus 10% contingency on net cash recovered. 4-year retroactive scan baseline. 90-day pilot, $1M all-in, asymmetric downside (contingency drops 10% to 7.5% on miss), ~$786M net to partnership
- Cross-agency CREB™ evidence reuse across CMS, OIG, DOJ, federal program integrity
Interested in participating?
We welcome conversations with institutions interested in early access to policy and attestation infrastructure or independent signing-node partnership.