Find What Was Hidden. Prove What Moved. Win the Case.
Family law, civil litigation, and estate proceedings turn on one question: is the disclosed financial picture accurate? In most cases, it is not. JIL reconstructs the actual financial picture and produces court-admissible evidence of what was hidden and when.
Traditional forensic accounting takes months. JIL Investigation Engine delivers court-admissible asset findings in days - with cryptographic proof that cannot be challenged on methodology.
The problem in one paragraph
Traditional asset discovery relies on voluntary disclosure and document subpoena - both of which can be controlled, delayed, and manipulated by the opposing party. By the time discovery is complete, assets have moved, entities have been dissolved, and cryptocurrency has been transferred to wallets with no disclosed connection to the subject. Forensic accountants can find patterns, but they cannot produce cryptographic proof of what happened and when. JIL can.
Five questions that determine case outcomes.
JIL runs a targeted investigation across on-chain financial activity, corporate entity networks, and payment history to answer:
- Are there undisclosed cryptocurrency or digital asset holdings connected to this subject?
- Were assets transferred out of accounts, wallets, or entities in the period leading up to or during proceedings?
- Does the disclosed corporate structure accurately represent who controls and benefits from these entities?
- Were payments made to connected parties, shell entities, or accounts that should have been disclosed?
- Does the subject's declared income and asset base match their actual financial activity over the lookback period?
Every finding is date-anchored, cryptographically sealed, and independently reproducible. Any auditor, opposing counsel, or court can verify the finding has not been altered.
Eight checks. Scoped to asset concealment and disclosure integrity.
- Hidden cryptocurrency and digital asset detection - undisclosed on-chain holdings traced across wallets, exchanges, DeFi positions, LP stakes, vesting contracts, and multisig controllers
- Pre-proceeding asset movement analysis - transfers, withdrawals, and wallet-to-wallet movements in the lookback window flagged with timing relative to known proceeding milestones
- UBO and beneficial ownership graph - corporate structure traced through registry data across jurisdictions; circular ownership and shell entity detection
- Connected party payment tracing - payments between subject and related entities, family members, or professional associates evaluated for disclosure consistency
- Rapid post-receipt asset movement - asset received and immediately moved to obscure the trail; timing and routing flagged
- DeFi position and vault detection - positions in lending protocols, liquidity pools, and yield vaults not visible on standard exchange lookups
- Income and asset consistency scoring - declared income and assets evaluated against actual on-chain and payment activity for the same period
- Date-anchored entity status - was this entity active, dissolved, or restructured on the dates relevant to the proceeding?
8 CHECKS. FINDINGS PRODUCED IN A FORMAT SUITABLE FOR EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY, COURT FILING, AND REGULATORY REFERRAL.
Settlement value. Case selection. Enforcement leverage.
For Family Law Attorneys and Forensic Accountants
- Hidden asset findings directly increase settlement or award value - discovery of a $2M undisclosed cryptocurrency position changes the outcome of a proceeding entirely
- Investigation cost (starting at 5 bps per record on payment history, plus a flat engagement fee for on-chain analysis) is typically a fraction of the asset recovery or settlement improvement it produces
- Cryptographic proof eliminates opposing counsel's ability to challenge the methodology - findings are independently reproducible and tamper-evident
- Investigation turnaround: days, not months - faster than traditional forensic accounting and without the deposition risk of a human expert who can be cross-examined on methodology
For Litigation Finance and Contingency Counsel
- Pre-case asset investigation de-risks case selection - know whether recoverable assets exist before committing resources to litigation
- Post-judgment enforcement evidence - trace where assets moved after judgment was entered to support enforcement proceedings
- Class action and mass tort asset tracing - run the same investigation against hundreds of defendants at scale; same cryptographic standard on every finding
For Corporate Litigation and Commercial Disputes
- Fraudulent conveyance claims supported by date-anchored evidence of asset transfers relative to known insolvency or dispute timelines
- Alter ego and piercing the corporate veil supported by UBO graph evidence showing actual control versus disclosed structure
- Trade secret and IP theft cases supported by payment tracing between the defendant and competitors or acquiring entities
Key Differentiator vs. Traditional Forensic Investigation
- Traditional forensic accountant: human expert, months of work, methodology is cross-examinable, findings are not independently verifiable by opposing party
- JIL Investigation Engine: cryptographic proof, days not months, methodology is deterministic and reproducible, findings cannot be altered after sealing, any party can verify independently
On-chain: 3 to 10 days. Payment history: minutes.
On-chain asset investigation engagements: 3 to 10 business days depending on entity complexity and lookback period.
Payment history investigation (if historical records are provided): 100 million records in 10 to 20 minutes.
Full combined investigation (on-chain plus payment history plus entity network): typically delivered within 2 weeks of engagement commencement.
Counsel, trustees, regulators, and contingency firms.
- Family law attorneys in high-net-worth divorce proceedings
- Forensic accountants and CPA firms supporting litigation
- Litigation finance firms evaluating case investment
- Bankruptcy trustees tracing fraudulent conveyance
- Corporate counsel in commercial disputes and trade secret cases
- Law enforcement and regulatory agencies (state AG, SEC, FBI) with subpoena authority
Findings are delivered as a structured evidence package suitable for court filing, expert witness support, or regulatory referral. Every finding includes the cryptographic attestation that proves it has not been altered since the investigation was sealed.
Request a Legal Asset Investigation Engagement
See JIL Investigation Engine applied to your family law, litigation, fraudulent conveyance, or enforcement matter. Findings delivered in days, sealed with court-admissible cryptographic proof.
or email support@jilsovereign.com