← Back to Patent Claims
Patent Claim 105 All Patents →

Weight-Curve-Selectable Liquidity Bootstrap Pool Engine

Linear, Exponential, Logarithmic, and Step Weight-Interpolation Shapes, Each Bid Gated by a Real-Time Compliance Check

Patent Claim JIL Sovereign July 2026 Claim 105 of 157

Executive Summary

A liquidity bootstrap pool (LBP) discovers a new token's market price by starting a weighted pool heavily skewed toward the token and letting the weight balance shift toward the paired reserve asset over a fixed window, which pushes the spot price down over time independent of trading volume. Most LBP implementations offer only a single, fixed linear weight decay. JIL Sovereign's weighted-pool engine instead treats the decay shape itself as a per-pool configuration choice among four curve types - Linear, Exponential, Logarithmic, and Step - each computing the same underlying weighted constant-product invariant but pacing the weight transition differently.

Every quote, at every point in the sale, is computed from the same core formula - price is a function of reserve balances and their current weights - so the curve selection changes only how quickly weight (and therefore price) moves through the sale window, not the pricing mechanism itself. Every individual bid is additionally re-checked against a mandatory compliance gate before it is even quoted, on top of per-wallet and total-raise caps and an anti-bot grace period at launch.

Core Innovation: The weight-interpolation curve shape is a first-class, per-pool selectable parameter - not a fixed protocol constant - letting issuers tune how aggressively early-window pricing decays, while every bid, regardless of curve shape, passes through the identical compliance gate before it is quoted.

Problem Statement

A fixed linear weight-decay schedule gives every token launch the same price-discovery dynamic regardless of what distribution outcome the issuer actually wants. An issuer worried about early-window whale accumulation at the most inflated starting price has no way to front-load the weight shift to compress that window; an issuer who wants a smoother, more gradual descent has no way to back-load it either - both are stuck with the same shape.

4
Selectable weight-interpolation curve shapes
2
Compliance checks per bid lifecycle (creation + every bid)
2
Hard participation caps enforced (per-wallet, total raise)

Why a Single Fixed Curve Falls Short

  • Linear-only decay: Offers no mechanism to compress or extend the highest-price window, regardless of what dynamic best fits a given token's expected demand curve.
  • Fixed-shape deployments requiring custom contracts: Achieving a different decay shape without a configurable curve parameter means deploying and auditing an entirely separate pool implementation.
  • Compliance checked only at launch: A compliance gate evaluated once at pool creation does nothing to stop a since-sanctioned or newly-ineligible participant from bidding mid-sale.

Technical Architecture

Selectable Curve Shapes

Curve TypeProgress Function (t = elapsed/duration)Effect
Linearprogress = tConstant-rate weight shift across the full window
Exponentialprogress = t²Back-loaded - slow early shift, accelerating later
Logarithmicprogress = ln(1 + 9t) / ln(10)Front-loaded - fast early shift, tapering later
Stepprogress = floor(4t) / 4Four discrete tranches rather than continuous movement

The resulting (weight_0, weight_1) pair feeds the same weighted constant-product spot-price and swap-quote formulas regardless of which curve produced it, so curve selection is purely a pacing choice layered on top of one pricing engine, not a different pricing engine per curve.

Bid-Level Protections

ProtectionEnforcement
Anti-bot grace windowBids rejected until anti_bot_blocks have elapsed after pool start
Per-wallet capmax_purchase_per_wallet, tracked cumulatively per participant address
Total-raise capmax_total_raise, checked before every quote and every applied swap
Compliance gateEvery bid independently re-checked against the compliance engine before being quoted; fail-closed if unreachable

Prior Art Differentiation

ApproachCurve ShapesPer-Bid Compliance?
Standard weighted LBP (fixed linear decay)1 (linear only)No / launch-time only
Dutch auction (single fixed decay function)1No
JIL Sovereign4, per-pool selectableYes - every bid, fail-closed

Patent Claim

Independent Claim 105: A computer-implemented method for operating a weighted liquidity bootstrap pool comprising: receiving, at pool creation, a selection among a plurality of predefined weight-interpolation curve shapes including at least a linear shape, a convex shape, a concave shape, and a discretized step shape; computing, at any point during a defined sale window, a current asset-weight pair by evaluating the elapsed-time fraction of said window against the selected curve shape's progress function; deriving a spot price and swap quote from said current asset-weight pair using a shared weighted constant-product formula independent of which curve shape was selected; and rejecting, prior to quoting, any bid that fails a compliance check re-evaluated for that specific bid, independent of any compliance check previously performed at pool creation.