Pillar 3 / Asset Intelligence / M&A counsel

Counterparty risk analysis for M&A diligence.

Your target has crypto holdings, foreign subsidiary structures, or offshore intermediaries. The reps + warranties in your purchase agreement turn on what you found during diligence. Asset Intelligence runs deterministic sanctions + ownership + transaction-pattern analysis per target so the diligence record is court-portable + court-defensible. Per-deal fixed fee with CREB(TM) per target.

Schedule walkthrough Pillar overview

21-30 day
Standard M&A turnaround
OFAC + UN
Sanctions screening sources
FRE 902(14)
Court-portable output
The problem m&a counsels actually have

Reps and warranties on counterparty risk turn on what diligence found. The diligence record needs to survive post-close litigation.

Post-close disputes around sanctions exposure, beneficial-ownership disclosure, and transaction-pattern risk routinely demand the diligence record. The acquirer's lawyers cite the diligence memo; the seller's lawyers attack the methodology. Asset Intelligence produces a deterministic, signed, jurisdictionally-anchored CREB(TM) per target so the diligence record is admissible without records-custodian deposition.

  • OFAC + sanctions exposure. Per-target sanctions screen across OFAC SDN, UN Consolidated, EU restrictive measures, UK sanctions list. Positive hits + clearance attestations both produce admissible evidence.
  • Beneficial-ownership mapping. Per-target UBO pierce across LLC + offshore + foundation structures. Critical for FinCEN Corporate Transparency Act compliance + sanctions due diligence.
  • Transaction-pattern risk. Per-target on-chain + off-chain transaction-pattern analysis. Identifies counterparty exposure to mixer activity, sanctioned wallet clusters, or laundering pattern indicators.
  • Reps + warranties defensibility. Post-close litigation routinely demands the diligence record. CREB(TM) output is FRE 902(14) admissible without producing JIL fact witnesses; supports both buyer + seller defense positions.
Use cases live with design partners

Pre-LOI sanctions screen

Per-target sanctions screen + beneficial-ownership pierce in 5-10 days. Output: go/no-go decision support before LOI commitment. SHA-256-sealed report.

Confirmatory diligence package

Per-target full diligence package: sanctions, UBO, transaction-pattern, transaction-history, key-relationship mapping. 21-30 day turnaround. CREB(TM) drops into the data room.

Cross-border deal diligence

Per-jurisdiction sanctions + transparency screen (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, Sudan). Critical for cross-border deals with sanctioned-jurisdiction exposure.

Post-close monitoring

Continuous monitoring on acquired entity sanctions + UBO + transaction-pattern profile. Per-month attestation supports ongoing compliance posture in regulated industries.

Pricing

Tiered per-engagement pricing

Deal sizeTierOutputPer-deal fixed fee
Under $50MT1 - Pre-LOI screenSanctions + UBO + viability score$5K-$15K
$50M-$500MT2 - Confirmatory diligenceFull diligence package + transaction-pattern + CREB(TM)$25K-$75K
$500M+T3 - Cross-border diligencePer-jurisdiction screen + on-chain transaction history + UBO + sanctions + CREB(TM) per entity$60K-$200K
AnyPost-close monitoringContinuous sanctions + UBO + transaction-pattern attestation$1.5K-$5K / month per acquired entity

Volume contracts (multiple deals / year) get tier-discount. Cross-border deals with sanctioned-jurisdiction exposure require T3. Per-deal pricing locks in at engagement signing.

Want to see counterparty diligence on a representative deal?

We do a 30-min walkthrough against a sanitized prior deal. You see T1 output + a sample T2 evidence packet. Most diligence teams use the T1 to determine if T2 spend is needed pre-LOI.

Schedule walkthrough Back to Asset Intelligence