[Chinese] On-chain policy enforcement means compliance rules are executed as part of the blockchain protocol itself, not as optional middleware. In JIL, every settlement transaction must satisfy on-chain policy conditions before the Sovereign Compliance Network (SCN) validators will include it in a block. This includes identity binding, sanctions verification, amount limits, and jurisdiction-specific requirements.
[Chinese] Off-chain compliance is inherently fragile because it can be bypassed. If compliance checks run outside the settlement protocol, there is always a gap between the check and the execution where conditions can change. Regulators increasingly expect compliance to be verifiable and tamper-proof, not just procedural.
[Chinese] JIL embeds policy enforcement in the consensus layer. SCN Validators verify compliance attestations as part of block production. A transaction without valid attestations is rejected at the protocol level - there is no way to bypass compliance and still achieve settlement. This on-chain enforcement produces cryptographic proof that compliance was verified, satisfying auditor requirements.
On-chain enforcement is embedded in the consensus protocol. SCN Validators reject non-compliant transactions at the block level. Off-chain enforcement runs as middleware that can potentially be bypassed or have timing gaps.
Yes. Policy configurations are governed through the protocol's governance mechanism. Changes require SCN validator consensus, ensuring no single party can unilaterally modify compliance rules.