Confidential Engagement Pathway

Court-ready evidence infrastructure for federal recovery actions.

JIL Sovereign Technologies provides immutable, FRE 902(14)-anchored detection and evidence infrastructure to attorneys, litigation funders, and authorized government entities pursuing healthcare recovery actions under the False Claims Act and parallel state statutes.

49.87M
Records audited per cycle
148
Integrity checks across 15 categories
17 min
Full-spectrum audit duration
01 / The Enforcement Reality

A record-setting year for federal recovery, and an underbuilt detection layer.

The Department of Justice reported the largest single-year False Claims Act recovery in the statute's history in fiscal year 2025. Healthcare drove the overwhelming majority. Whistleblower-initiated qui tam suits broke prior records. Every public DOJ statement reinforces the same theme: enforcement is shifting from tip-driven to analytics-driven. The detection layer that produces admissible evidence at scale is the constraint.

$6.8B
FCA settlements and judgments, FY2025. Highest in the law's history.
Source: U.S. DOJ
$5.7B
Healthcare-related share of FY2025 FCA recoveries.
Source: U.S. DOJ
1,297
Qui tam suits filed in FY2025. Record-breaking annual volume.
Source: U.S. DOJ
15-30%
Statutory range for relator recoveries. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d).
Source: 31 U.S.C.
02 / Where Detection Falls Short

Volume without court-ready provenance is not actionable.

Existing healthcare analytics platforms surface anomalies. Few produce evidence. Fewer still produce evidence with the cryptographic provenance required to satisfy authentication standards under the Federal Rules of Evidence and to defend original-source status under the public disclosure bar of 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4). The gap between detection and admissibility is the single largest cost driver in modern recovery practice.

- 01

Authentication exposure

Standard exports lack chain-of-custody and tamper resistance. Authentication challenges burn months and budget before the merits are reached.

- 02

Original-source contestability

Without provable detection timing, relators face protracted disputes over whether their information predated public disclosures. The bar can dispose of meritorious cases.

- 03

Analytical opacity

Black-box scoring resists discovery. Defendants demand methodology disclosures that are not contractually permitted to be produced. The case stalls.

- 04

Per-claim resolution

Aggregate findings invite battle-of-experts disputes. Per-claim, per-entity, per-network packages move cases to settlement faster.

03 / The CREB Standard

Court-Ready Evidence Bundle. Per-claim. Per-entity. Per-network.

CREB is JIL's per-claim admissible evidence package. Each bundle contains the underlying claim record, the integrity check failure profile, the cryptographic anchor on CourtChain establishing detection time, and the methodology hash demonstrating analytical reproducibility. Designed from inception to satisfy Federal Rule of Evidence 902(14) self-authentication standards.

Why provenance matters more than detection.

Detection produces leads. Provenance produces settlements. CourtChain anchors every detection event to an immutable, validator-attested ledger across thirteen jurisdictions, providing mathematical proof of the moment information became known to the relator.

For original-source determinations under § 3730(e)(4), this is structurally distinct from any prior-art evidence framework. It converts a contested factual question into a verifiable cryptographic record.

StandardFRE 902(14)
AnchorCourtChain L1
Validators13 jurisdictions
CryptographyEd25519 + Dilithium-III
ResolutionPer-claim
Methodology hashReproducible
04 / Who Engages With Us

A platform for the practitioners who pursue recovery.

JIL is a detection-and-proof infrastructure provider. We do not pursue recovery actions on behalf of customers and we do not work on contingency. Our role is upstream: producing the court-ready evidence that practitioners and government enforcement entities require to act.

i

Qui tam counsel

Methodology partnership for relator representation. Original-source documentation. CREB package production for sealed filings under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b).

ii

Litigation funders

Asset-class diligence support. Detection methodology audit. Per-case cost projections and recovery probability frameworks for non-recourse funding.

iii

Government enforcement

Detection infrastructure for federal and state agencies. Pre-clearance audit, retroactive validation, and CREB delivery into existing enforcement workflows.

iv

Compliance counsel

Pre-litigation self-disclosure support. Internal audit infrastructure for entities pursuing voluntary remediation under DOJ self-disclosure guidance.

Confidential Engagement

Methodology disclosure under NDA only.

Substantive methodology details, detection coverage, validator architecture, and platform pricing are disclosed exclusively under executed mutual non-disclosure. Initial briefings are 60 minutes and require firm or organizational identification, area of focus, and counsel of record where applicable.

Disclaimer JIL Sovereign Technologies, Inc. is a detection and evidence infrastructure provider. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice, an offer of legal services, an accusation of wrongdoing against any person or entity, or a representation regarding the merits of any actual or potential matter. Statistical figures are drawn exclusively from public sources cited inline. JIL does not pursue recovery actions on its own behalf and does not solicit relators or claimants. References to the False Claims Act and related statutes are general statutory descriptions and do not constitute interpretation or counsel. Engagement with attorneys, litigation funders, or government entities is conducted under separate contractual frameworks and confidentiality terms.