Verticals - P2P

Procurement and Accounts Payable Integrity

Score every vendor payment before it leaves the ERP.

P2P Integrity sits between an enterprise's ERP, procurement, and AP systems and the payment rail. Each proposed vendor payment is scored before disbursement, and any transaction that fails integrity checks ships with a CREB-grade evidence package.

JIL is not an ERP, not a procurement platform, not an accounting system, not an audit firm. The product fits cleanly into the existing JIL architecture - enterprise AP fraud and procurement fraud share most patterns with healthcare claim fraud. Duplicate detection, ghost-vendor detection, kickback detection, and pricing-anomaly detection map directly.

$300M-$1B
ARR TAM at maturity
~$1T
annual US occupational fraud (5% of revenue)
12
net-new P2P-specific checks
Schedule a Call How the pipeline works
Architecture - Visual

Procurement and Accounts Payable Integrity at a glance.

Where the integrity layer sits, what it produces, and how the sealed CREB flows back to the buyer's existing systems.

PO RECEIPT INVOICE 3WM JIL SOVEREIGN TECHNOLOGIES VERTICAL BRIEF · 07 OF 08 PROCUREMENT & AP INTEGRITY Vendor payment integrity, three-way match, ghost vendors, kickbacks, bid rigging, FCPA, T&E, P-card abuse. US REVENUE LOSS TO FRAUD ~$1T ACFE: 5% of revenue (median) P2P + AP FRAUD SHARE ~50% Of all occupational fraud cases CHECK TRANSFER RATE ~80% From healthcare. Highest reuse of any vertical. FRAUD PATTERNS Duplicate invoice payments Ghost vendors and shell firms Vendor master data manipulation Bid rigging and collusion Split purchases (threshold evasion) Change order abuse (construction) P-card and T&E manipulation JIL APPROACH Three-way match real-time scoring Vendor master change detection ERP integration (SAP, Oracle, NetSuite) Cross-cuts every JIL customer CREB for FCPA, FCA, RICO KEY BUYERS Fortune 500 CFO / Controller SOX 404 compliance, FCPA exposure Internal Audit / CCO Compliance program ownership Big 4 forensic practices Channel partnership Federal contractors FAR compliance, qui tam exposure DETECTION AND PROOF. NOT RECOVERY. Highest TAM ceiling. Cross-cuts every JIL customer. Land-and-expand multiplier. jilsovereign.com RAN · CourtChain · PoCS · Sealed Escrow
Figure - P2P architecture, integration surface, and CREB output
Why this vertical

Where this product earns its place.

The strategic case for P2P as a JIL line of business - what makes the wedge defensible, what makes it economically meaningful, and how it compounds with the rest of the platform.

Largest TAM

Highest non-healthcare ceiling in the portfolio

ACFE 2024 reports a median 5% of revenue lost to occupational fraud. With US private-sector revenue exceeding $20T, the loss base is approximately $1T annually. Procurement and AP represent the majority share.

Buyer parallel

CFOs, controllers, internal audit

Established procurement budgets, recurring-engagement patterns, direct ROI accountability. Sales motion mirrors selling provider-fraud detection to MCO compliance officers - same buyer archetype, same scrutiny standards, same procurement cadence.

Distribution moat

ERP integration becomes infrastructure

Once integrated into SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Fusion Cloud, NetSuite, Workday Financials, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and Sage Intacct, JIL becomes embedded infrastructure. Switching costs are high; recurring revenue is structurally durable.

Cross-sell

Every JIL vertical also runs an AP function

Every healthcare provider, every WC carrier, every grant-receiving nonprofit, every regional center, every trade-finance bank also runs an AP function. Vertical penetration anywhere creates land-and-expand here.

What we build

Net-new checks, sealed evidence.

A representative slice of the P2P-specific check pack. Each one runs in the same five-stage pipeline as the rest of the platform - intake, profile load, parallel checks, verdict, sealed CREB - and ships with a 14-of-20 BFT signature, a CourtChain L1 anchor, and a reproducibility manifest pinning the exact check-logic version.

Check

Three-Way Match

Quantity, unit price, total, and vendor identity match across PO, goods receipt, and vendor invoice within tolerance. Flags exceptions and the user who approved the override.

Check

Vendor Master Data Anomaly

Detects vendor record changes (banking, address) within suspicious time windows of payment processing. Cross-references vendor banking against employee payroll banking.

Check

Ghost Vendor Detection

Verifies vendor business existence through corporate registry, physical address verification, and web presence. Flags vendors with no verifiable existence beyond the customer's records.

Check

Split Purchase Detection

Detects transaction clustering just under approval thresholds. Cross-references by vendor, requestor, and time window. Applies Benford's Law to first-digit distribution.

Check

Bid-Rigging Pattern

Detects parallel pricing, complementary bidding, bid rotation. Cross-references bidder communications metadata where accessible. DOJ Antitrust Division procurement-collusion guidance.

Check

Vendor Markup Anomaly

Detects statistically anomalous markups against comparable-vendor pricing and benchmark databases (Spend HQ, GEP SMART, ProcurementIQ). Flags persistent overpricing patterns.

Check

Sequential Invoice Number

Detects sequential or near-sequential invoice numbers from a vendor that should have many other customers. Flags single-customer-dependency or fabricated-invoicing patterns.

Check

HR-Payroll-AP Triangulation

Phantom-employee detection. Cross-references HR records, payroll records, and AP vendor master. Detects payroll-to-vendor migration patterns and employee-vendor overlap.

Buyer profile

Who runs this in production.

The buyer pattern for P2P - who carries the budget, who carries the regulatory exposure, and how the engagement starts. Most first engagements are a Retroactive Proof Audit on a defined lookback window; Pre-Settlement integration follows once the check pack is calibrated to the customer's profile.

Fortune 500 finance

CFOs and controllers, internal-audit heads, chief compliance officers, CPOs, treasury teams. Public companies face SOX 404 baseline interest. Federal contractors face FCPA and False Claims Act exposure.

Big 4 channel partners

Deloitte, EY, PwC, KPMG forensic, internal-audit, and FCPA practices. Second-tier: BDO, Grant Thornton, RSM, Crowe, CLA, Forvis Mazars, Marcum. Channel economics with white-label tension.

ERP and procurement integrators

SAP Ariba, Coupa, Oracle Procurement Cloud, Workday Strategic Sourcing, Ivalua, GEP SMART, Jaggaer. AP automation: Tipalti, AvidXchange, Stampli, Bill.com. T&E: Concur, Workday Spend Management.

Federal contractors

Companies with active False Claims Act compliance exposure and FAR Part 6/43 commercial-procurement governance pressure. Multinationals with FCPA exposure on foreign vendor payments.

Pricing pattern

Four-SKU model. No percentage. No contingency.

Pricing carries over from the canonical four-SKU model unchanged - Retroactive Scan (flat fee), Retroactive Proof Audit (with credit-back against the next subscription tier), Pre-Settlement Subscription (tiered annual), and per-case CREB bundles (Tier 3 court-ready evidence). Asset Intelligence is the standard fifth SKU where the vertical needs it.

No percentage of recovery. No contingency. No success fees. JIL is detection and proof, not recovery. Recovery sits with the customer or its existing partners (subrogation counsel, recovery vendors, regulators). The structure is what allows JIL to operate as neutral integrity infrastructure across plaintiffs and defendants, payers and payees, regulators and the regulated, on the same case.

Ready to scope a P2P engagement?

Initial briefings are 60 minutes. Retroactive Proof Audit lookback windows, check-pack profile design, and integration runbook are available under NDA. We start where the buyer's procurement gate is shortest.