Retroactive Verification - business pack
Court-ready CREB(TM) bundles for fraud recovery, FCA litigation, regulatory inquiry, and counterparty disputes. Per-bundle pricing. Live and shipping today.
What Retroactive Settlement Verification is - in one paragraph.
Retroactive Verification is the per-case evidence-bundle product. DOJ Civil Frauds, HHS-OIG, state MFCUs, and FCA relator's counsel buy it to convert their existing case theory into a signed, reproducible CREB(TM) bundle. Customer pays per bundle; price comparable to a single outside-investigator workup.
Three things to nail in every conversation
Per-case, not per-seat
Per-CREB™ bundle pricing. No annual subscription minimum. Customers buy what they need, when they need it.
Federal-court grade
Designed for FRE 902(14) self-authentication. Court-appointed expert can verify the chain of custody without a JIL fact witness at trial. Most state MFCUs accept the same.
Methodology + data + signature in one
CREB™ carries the deterministic methodology, the public-data row that fired each rule, the threshold, and the reasoning chain. Reproducible by any analyst with the data.
Target market
| Segment | Live count today | 2026 TAM (USD) | JIL fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ Civil Frauds + AUSAs | ~94 US Attorneys offices + DOJ Main | $45M (per-case workups + e-discovery) | Highest fit; FRE 902(14) is their evidentiary standard |
| HHS-OIG analysts + SACs | ~200 OIG-OI analysts + 10 SAC offices | $25M | Highest fit; CMS public-data + Medicaid TAF analysis |
| State MFCU directors | 53 (50 states + DC, PR, VI) | $35M | High fit; per-referral CREB™ matches MFCU intake format |
| FCA relator's counsel (qui tam firms) | ~60 specialty firms | $120M (case prep + expert engagement) | High fit; reduces per-case prep time + cost |
| MCO SIU + outside FWA counsel | ~32 MCOs + ~25 specialty firms | $80M | High fit; per-bundle replaces per-investigator-hour billing |
| Class-action securities counsel | ~40 specialty firms | $60M | Medium-high fit; SEC FTD + settlement-fail evidence |
Audience-specific decks
Use these as outline; bring your own narrative. Decks marked "in development" link to the closest available reference until the full deck ships.
Recovery Infrastructure Brief
Audience: DOJ Civil Frauds AUSAs + HHS-OIG SACs + analysts. Pitch lens: per-case evidence package designed for FRE 902(14).
Relator's Counsel Brief
Audience: FCA relator's counsel + class-action firms. Pitch lens: per-bundle reduces case prep cost; CREB™ is the evidentiary substrate.
MFCU Director Brief
Audience: State Medicaid Fraud Control Unit directors + analysts. Pitch lens: per-referral CREB™ aligns with MFCU intake format.
Pricing tiers + SLA financial backing
Per-CREB™ bundle pricing. No annual minimum. Volume bundles for repeat customers. Same SLA financial backing structure as Pre-Clearance for accuracy claims.
| SLA tier | Price | Uptime SLA | Latency SLA | Backing cap | Buyer profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier A - Standard CREB™ | $2,500 per bundle | 99.9% | 5-10 day delivery | $50K accuracy claim cap | First-time + low-volume buyers |
| Tier B - Institutional CREB™ | $1,800 per bundle (volume tier) | 99.95% | 3-7 day delivery | $250K accuracy claim cap; up to $5M / yr aggregate | MCOs + DOJ + recurring-engagement customers (50+ bundles / yr) |
| Tier C - Premium CREB™ | $1,200 per bundle (high-volume) | 99.99% | 2-4 day delivery | $500K accuracy cap; $25M / yr aggregate | Top-volume customers (500+ bundles / yr); DOJ Main + national MFCU consortium |
Add-ons + line items
Expert witness retention
If a customer needs a JIL-trained expert to testify, retention is $750/hr with a 4-hour minimum. Most cases don't need this (the CREB™ is self-authenticating).
Custom data-source integration
If a customer needs a private data source ingested into the methodology (e.g., proprietary loss-run + public CMS data), per-source engineering fee billed upfront.
Same-day rush
Tier A or B with same-day delivery: 2x bundle price. Subject to engineering capacity.
Annual prepay (Tier C lock-in)
Customers committing to 500+ bundles annually lock in Tier C pricing for the year regardless of actual volume.
What to say to whom
Buying committees are rarely one person. Use the right framing per role.
| Role | What they care about | Lead with | Don't say |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ AUSA / Civil Frauds | Self-authenticating evidence; expert witness avoidance; FRE 902(14) admissibility | "FRE 902(14) self-authenticating CREB™. Court-appointed expert verifies the cryptographic chain - no JIL fact witness needed at trial." | Don't promise we'll testify; promise we won't have to |
| HHS-OIG analyst / SAC | Public-data first-pass triage; reproducible methodology; per-finding evidence | "Public CMS + Medicaid TAF + USAspending findings, pre-ranked, with deterministic methodology + thresholds inside the CREB™." | Don't position as replacing the analyst; we accelerate the first pass |
| State MFCU director | Referral-package format; investigator workflow alignment; budget per case | "Per-referral CREB™ matches typical state MFCU intake. Reduces back-and-forth on methodology + provenance. Investigators see signed evidence + reproducible analysis day one." | Don't pitch as fraud-detection replacement; we feed their pipeline |
| FCA relator's counsel (qui tam) | Case-prep cost; complaint-credibility substrate; per-case predictability | "Per-bundle pricing makes case-prep cost predictable. CREB™ is the evidentiary substrate that helps your relator's counsel build a credible complaint." | JIL is not a relator; we don't file qui tam complaints |
| MCO SIU director | Case throughput; outside counsel hand-off quality; per-case cost vs. in-house investigator | "Per-bundle replaces per-investigator-hour billing. Same evidence package serves both your in-house SIU and your outside FCA counsel." | Don't promise to find fraud they don't already suspect; we work from their case theory |
Close patterns
["Show me one": /samples/verdict-record-retroactive-verification.] ["What's a CREB™ look like to a court": route to the FRE 902(14) framework on /verify.] ["How fast": Tier A 5-10 days; Tier B 3-7; Tier C 2-4.]
What blocks deals - and how we handle it
Be honest about what we don't have. The buyer respects it more than dodging.
| # | Objection | What we have | What we don't | How to handle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Per-case cost vs. in-house workup | Per-bundle CREB™ at $1,200-$2,500; comparable to one outside-investigator workup | For very small cases (<$50K recovery), per-bundle math doesn't work | Recommend annual prepay or volume tier; for tiny cases, suggest customer use sandbox + bundle internally |
| 2 | Court hasn't seen FRE 902(14) crypto evidence yet (in our jurisdiction) | Federal courts increasingly accept; reference cases on file | Some state courts are still warming up | Lead with cases-on-file; offer a pre-trial admissibility memo at $750 fixed fee |
| 3 | Customer's existing investigator network resists vendor disruption | JIL CREB™ is the substrate; investigators still do interpretation + recommendation | Some investigators see this as displacement | Position as 'helps your investigators ship more cases per quarter' - it's a productivity story, not a replacement |
| 4 | Public-data accuracy / provenance challenges | Per-CREB™ methodology + threshold + data row + reasoning chain; reproducible | Public data has known errors | We don't claim the public data is correct; we claim the methodology applied to it is reproducible. CREB™ makes this explicit. |
| 5 | Statute of limitations + admissibility timing | Retroactive analysis + CREB™ delivered 2-10 days; well within typical SOL windows | If customer brings us in 30 days before SOL expiry, we can't help | Lead with: bring us in early in case-development, not at SOL deadline |
Legal posture - in lawyer-friendly bullets
For the buyer's GC + CCO + outside counsel. Send this section verbatim ahead of the legal call.
Service provider, not legal counsel
JIL produces signed evidence + reproducible methodology. The legal strategy + the recovery action stay with the customer's counsel. JIL does not provide legal advice.
FRE 902(14) self-authentication
Every CREB(TM) is designed to satisfy FRE 902(14) for self-authenticating electronic records. Cryptographic signature + L1 anchor + 14-of-20 BFT validator quorum makes it verifiable by court-appointed expert without JIL fact witness.
Standard professional-services MSA
Per-bundle engagements use a JIL Professional Services MSA + per-engagement Statement of Work. Standard SaaS-style; no special licensing required.
Source-data provenance
Each CREB™ itemizes its source data (URL, dataset version, pulled-at timestamp, sha256). Customer's auditor can trace any finding back to the public data row that fired the rule.
Non-relator status
JIL is NOT an FCA relator and does not file qui tam complaints. We produce evidence; the customer's counsel files.
Confidentiality
Customer-specific case work is confidential. JIL does not disclose customer engagement existence, content, or outcomes without customer written consent. Customer can require source-data isolation in dedicated AWS account on Tier B+.