Licensed gaming operators · Leagues · Integrity bodies · Regulators

Protect Gaming Payment Integrity and Prove Match Manipulation With Court-Ready Evidence.

JIL Gaming Integrity verifies gaming payment flows against KYC, geolocation, AML, sanctions, responsible-gaming, and chargeback rules, and produces evidence-backed attestation records for every decision. The flagship Match and Betting Integrity module ingests betting market data and integrity-body alerts, runs manipulation detection, and seals a CREB anchored on CourtChain when manipulation is confirmed.

Two products, one engine. The iGaming and Gaming Payment Integrity vertical re-points the existing JIL attestation library at gaming payment flows. The Match and Betting Integrity flagship corroborates Sportradar, Genius Sports, and IBIA alerts and turns a confirmed verdict into court-ready evidence. JIL identifies and evidences; leagues and regulators adjudicate.

Business use

Built for integrity across the gaming payment chain.

Licensed operators face license-condition pressure from state gaming commissions, the UKGC, the MGA, and the Brazil regulated-betting regime, plus BSA and FinCEN AML obligations and sports-integrity league rules. Leagues and integrity bodies need defensible evidence when a market is manipulated. JIL provides the attestation layer for gaming payment flows, the manipulation-detection and corroboration layer for betting markets, and the court-ready evidence record that backs every decision. No custody of player funds.

14 cat.
Check categories A through N
CREB
FRE 902(14) evidence
CourtChain
Manipulation anchored
14-of-20
BFT quorum, post-quantum

Two products

One attestation engine, two gaming products.

Both products settle and meter on the JIL token exactly as every existing vertical does. Neither issues a player-facing token, touches a player gambling balance, or creates any consumer gaming asset.

PRODUCT 1 · IGAMING

iGaming and Gaming Payment Integrity

A payment integrity vertical for licensed online gambling operators (sportsbooks, online casinos, iLottery, DFS, poker). It re-points the JIL attestation library at gaming payment flows across eight check categories: KYC and onboarding integrity (A), geolocation and jurisdiction integrity (B), AML and transaction monitoring (C), sanctions, PEP, and watchlist screening (D), responsible-gaming enforcement (E), bonus and promo abuse (F), multi-accounting and collusion (G), and payment and chargeback integrity (H). Every check produces a signed, metered attestation record.

PRODUCT 2 · FLAGSHIP

Match and Betting Integrity

The differentiated, high-exposure flagship. It ingests betting market data (odds, stakes, line movement) and integrity-body alerts, runs anomaly and manipulation detection across six categories I through N, corroborates Sportradar UFDS, Genius Sports, and IBIA alerts, and renders a manipulation-confirmed verdict. On confirmation, the CREB builder assembles the evidence chain, signs it post-quantum, and anchors it on CourtChain under FRE 902(14). The CREB is delivered to leagues, integrity bodies, regulators, and law enforcement.

iGaming payment integrity

Eight check categories across the payment chain.

A · KYC

KYC and onboarding integrity

Identity verification (document plus biometric match), age-threshold attestation per jurisdiction, source-of-funds review for high-stakes and VIP accounts, synthetic-identity detection, duplicate identity across operator brands, and re-verification on material profile change.

B · GEO

Geolocation and jurisdiction integrity

At-wager location-within-boundary attestation, VPN, proxy, and spoofing detection at the wager moment, cross-border wager-attempt blocks, geofence integrity for on-property and state-line cases, and device-location consistency over a session.

C · AML

AML and transaction monitoring

Structuring and smurfing patterns, rapid deposit-minimal-play-withdrawal loops, velocity and threshold breaches, payment-instrument churn, peer-to-peer value transfer via gameplay, payment-rail risk scoring, and SAR and STR trigger support for regulator filing.

D · SANCTIONS

Sanctions, PEP, and watchlist

OFAC SDN matching, UN, EU, and UK (OFSI) consolidated-list matching, PEP screening, adverse-media corroboration, and ongoing rescreening on list updates.

E · RG

Responsible-gaming enforcement

Self-exclusion registry enforcement (proof the wager was blocked), deposit-limit and cool-off enforcement, affordability and harm-marker monitoring, underage-attempt blocks, and marketing-suppression to excluded players.

F · PROMO

Bonus and promo abuse

Bonus-abuse and multi-account harvesting patterns, arbitrage and matched-betting abuse, wagering-requirement circumvention, and promo-stacking across linked accounts.

G · COLLUSION

Multi-accounting and collusion

Linked-account cluster attestation (device, payment, behavioral graph), collusion-at-table detection in poker and peer games, bot and automated-play detection, and account-takeover signals.

H · CHARGEBACK

Payment and chargeback integrity

Location-verified chargeback-fraud attestation, friendly-fraud distinction, stolen-instrument detection, and withdrawal-fraud and mule-account attestation.

Match and Betting Integrity flagship

From market anomaly to court-ready verdict.

Market data and integrity-body alerts ingest continuously. Categories I through M run against rolling baselines, investigators corroborate, and a deterministic verdict path renders a manipulation-confirmed verdict before any CREB is built. The verdict is determined by deterministic rules, integrity-body corroboration, and statutory and league citations, with human signoff. AVA accelerates operations (clustering anomalies, scoring corroboration consensus, drafting narratives) but never determines whether manipulation occurred.

I · BET PATTERN

Bet pattern anomaly

Abnormal stake-volume attestation on a market, coordinated betting across accounts and operators, late-money surge correlated to outcome, and liability-concentration anomalies.

J · ODDS

Odds and market integrity

Anomalous line-movement attestation, cross-operator odds divergence, and suspended-market correlation to suspicious activity.

K · PARTICIPANT

Participant and insider integrity

Participant-linked betting attestation (player, official, staff), insider-information betting patterns, and prohibited-bettor registry matching for athletes and officials.

L · SYNDICATE

Collusion and syndicate detection

Syndicate-cluster attestation, cross-event laddering, and account-to-event correlation graphs.

M · CORROBORATION

Integrity-body corroboration

IBIA suspicious-betting-alert corroboration, Sportradar UFDS AI alert corroboration, Genius Sports integrity-alert corroboration, and multi-source alert consensus scoring.

N · CREB

CREB generation and verdict

Manipulation-confirmed verdict attestation, evidence-chain completeness, CREB build and CourtChain anchor under FRE 902(14), and qui-tam and enforcement-suitability scoring via the AVA tiered model.

Use cases

Operator and integrity domains covered.

SPORTSBOOK

Online sportsbooks

At-wager geolocation, KYC and AML attestation, multi-accounting and collusion clustering, and chargeback integrity, with the Match and Betting Integrity flagship watching bet patterns and odds movement across the book.

CASINO

Online casinos

Onboarding and sanctions screening, responsible-gaming enforcement, bonus and promo-abuse detection, and chargeback and withdrawal-fraud attestation for slots and table products.

ILOTTERY

iLottery

Jurisdiction and age-threshold attestation, self-exclusion enforcement, and AML monitoring for state-regulated online lottery programs.

DFS

Daily fantasy sports

DFS self-exclusion enforcement, multi-accounting and collusion detection, and bonus-abuse screening, aligned to the Coalition for Fantasy Sports framework.

POKER

Online poker

Collusion-at-table detection, chip-dumping as laundering (peer-to-peer value transfer), bot and automated-play detection, and account-takeover signals.

LEAGUES · REGULATORS

Leagues, integrity bodies, regulators

Match and Betting Integrity corroboration of IBIA, Sportradar, and Genius alerts, prohibited-bettor registry matching, and a court-ready CREB delivered to the league, integrity body, regulator, or law enforcement that adjudicates.

Technical deep dive

How it integrates with operator and integrity systems.

  • Operator transaction, account, and session feeds (per-operator data agreement)
  • GeoComply at-wager geolocation, VPN and proxy detection, and geofencing
  • KYC and identity results (document plus biometric verification)
  • OFAC, UN, EU, and UK (OFSI) sanctions lists plus PEP and adverse-media screening
  • State self-exclusion registries, GAMSTOP, and DFS self-exclusion
  • Device and fraud signals (device fingerprint, digital footprint)
  • Sportradar feeds and UFDS AI alerts, Genius Sports data and integrity alerts, IBIA suspicious-betting alerts
  • Prohibited-bettor registries from leagues and federations

KYC and onboarding (A), geolocation and jurisdiction (B), AML and transaction monitoring (C), sanctions, PEP, and watchlist (D), responsible-gaming enforcement (E), bonus and promo abuse (F), multi-accounting and collusion (G), and payment and chargeback integrity (H). Each check registers in the existing attestation engine with a stable check ID, is scored and recorded like every other vertical, and produces a regulator-readable record in one audit trail.

Bet pattern anomaly (I), odds and market integrity (J), participant and insider integrity (K), collusion and syndicate detection (L), integrity-body corroboration (M), and CREB generation and verdict (N). Categories I through M run against rolling baselines and feed the verdict path; multi-source alert consensus scoring corroborates IBIA, Sportradar, and Genius alerts before a verdict is rendered.

iGaming payment checks return a Pass / Review / Block verdict per event with a risk score, triggered checks, reason codes, and rule citations; geolocation and KYC checks are inline at the wager and onboarding moments. Match Integrity opens a Verdict-path case when a scored anomaly exceeds threshold and renders a manipulation-confirmed verdict only after integrity-body corroboration and human signoff. The verdict is determined by deterministic rules, statutory and league citations, and corroboration; AVA accelerates operations but never determines whether manipulation occurred.

A manipulation-confirmed verdict with a complete evidence chain triggers a sealed Court Ready Evidence Bundle (CREB), self-authenticating under FRE 902(14), anchored on CourtChain with an Ed25519 plus Dilithium-III (ML-DSA-65) signature and Kyber KEM. The CREB assembles the underlying market and betting evidence, the corroborating integrity-body alerts, the attestation records, the verdict reasoning, and the cryptographic chain of custody. Leagues, integrity bodies, regulators, and law enforcement retrieve the bundle directly; no reconstruction.

  1. Phase 0: stand up ingestion and normalization adapters for operator feeds plus the canonical event schema, and wire P0 sources (GeoComply, official sanctions lists, ComplyAdvantage, initial state self-exclusion)
  2. Phase 1: ship the iGaming MVP (Category A, B, D, E onboarding, geolocation, sanctions, responsible gaming), with token metering and operator workspace surfacing
  3. Phase 2: full Vertical 11 (Category C, F, G, H AML, bonus abuse, multi-accounting, chargeback) and P1 sources
  4. Phase 3: Match and Betting Integrity flagship, wiring Sportradar, Genius Sports, and IBIA, shipping Category I through N and the Verdict path with CREB and CourtChain anchoring
  5. Phase 4: align ingestion to the IBIA Data Standards Kitemark and pursue GLI and eCOGRA certification per jurisdiction

Mapped to US BSA and FinCEN AML and SAR obligations, state gaming commissions, the UK Gambling Commission, the Malta Gaming Authority, the Brazil regulated-betting regime, and sports-integrity league rules. Aligned to the IBIA Data Standards Kitemark, GLI, and eCOGRA. Data is classified at ingestion and routed to the correct sovereign vault per jurisdiction; raw PII is reduced to hashes plus result wherever the regime allows.

What this is not

Scope, plainly.

  • Not a player-facing token. The JIL token is solely the settlement and metering rail for attestation volume (Corridor-style 5 bps per attestation event)
  • Does not represent or touch any gambling balance, wager, or payout
  • Not a consumer gaming asset, and JIL is never marketed as a gaming or gambling token
  • No custody of player funds; not a payment processor and not a gambling operator
  • Not an adjudicator. JIL identifies and evidences; leagues, integrity bodies, and regulators adjudicate
  • Not legal advice. Gaming and securities counsel review is required before launch

Commercial model

Three-leg pricing, unchanged from every JIL vertical.

Size-scaled flat retroactive fees prove integrity value on historical data, a 12.5% annual platform fee on disclosed integrity spend covers continuous attestation, and a 10% net cash recovery share aligns incentives. There is no per-claim or per-wager pricing. Gaming is incremental attestation throughput on the existing network, not a new economic model. Pricing is shared under engagement; figures are not published here.

Move gaming integrity to court-ready evidence.

Brief your compliance, integrity, or trading-risk team. We will walk the iGaming payment integrity vertical, the Match and Betting Integrity flagship, the integrity-body corroboration path, the sealed CREB anchored on CourtChain, and the deployment phases.

Request gaming integrity demo Request technical design